WA’s Gap in Eating Disorder Treatment

Story By Anonymous

It has been a difficult decision to speak out about this. It is difficult not because of the judgement that tends to attach itself when mental health is related but because of the repercussions in my own treatment.

I am a 17-year-old girl with anorexia nervosa. An illness that kills 1 in 5 sufferers. I have been in the system since I was 14. Over the last 3 years, I have received life-saving inpatient treatment numerous times. I have also borne witness to the steady decline of services for children with an eating disorder over these 3 years.

As a person still receiving treatment, I would be naive to think that there is no possibility for repercussions when speaking out; however, when an illness has come so close to killing both myself and those that I love, every single voice counts.

Whilst there are so many areas of improvements desperately needed for eating disorder treatment in Western Australia (WA), the newly created gap in the age group of 16-18 is especially alarming.

What is even more alarming is the nature of eating disorders within this age group. Just looking at some simple statistics it is made apparent that there is a huge need for treatment for children aged 16-18. The facts are that:

  • Young people, aged 14-25 are at the most risk of developing an eating disorder.
  • It is known that recovery from an eating disorder is likely to be a long process (years).
  • From 2015-16, females aged 15-24 made up 57% of Australian hospitalisations with a primary diagnosis of an eating disorder (Lawrence et al. 2015).
  • From 2015-16, females aged 15-24 made up 58% of community mental health care contacts provided. Making up the largest percentage for age group, in comparison to 14% for females aged under 15 (Lawrence et al. 2015).
  • 1/5 cases of anorexia nervosa are fatal, making this the highest death rate of all psychiatric illnesses.

* these statistics do not represent the diversity of eating disorders within our society; unfortunately, these statistics are hard to come by

Although more recent statistics are absent from current knowledge, it is a known fact that eating disorders are on the rise; so, these statistics would be presumingly higher now than when recorded.

In WA, there are little services available for children (under 18’s) with an eating disorder. Up until this year, Princess Margaret Hospital (PMH) was the primary public treatment for children with eating disorders within WA.

PMH, ran a specialised eating disorder program which contained both inpatient and outpatient treatment. Far from perfect due to the lack of funding, the service still provided inpatient treatment for those up to 18-years-old. The start of the services’ decline was first visible in the change of the nature of inpatient treatment.

Inpatient admissions for nutritional rehabilitation are both complex and lengthy, lasting for numerous weeks or even months. It is not uncommon for a patient to have more than one inpatient admission.

The inpatient treatment prior to 2017 included continued school education, 7-day meal support and different therapy groups throughout the week. However, 2017 saw a shift with the removal of weekly meal support. Only having support during the week, leaving children unsupported throughout the weekends. Due to this, many patients resorted to drinking nutritional drinks without even attempting physical food or even worse, not eating at all. Eating disorders are mental illnesses, and without any distractions or encouragement during meal times disordered thoughts can easily influence a sufferer.

Since then there has been less and less treatment available. With, people left at a loss at what to do – including the staff. Left out to dry with the lack of resources and funding provided to them, many staff have presumably left for ‘greener pastures’. Only one Doctor is dedicated to the inpatient and outpatient program, which treats majority of the children in WA with an eating disorder.

The greatest decline in treatment was for 16-18-year-old patients. This age group has been a matter of contention within the eating disorder system for some time.

Up until recently, patients who were needing hospital admissions for lifesaving nutritional rehabilitation or mental health crisis admissions were needed to be granted executive approval. Approval was granted more often than not and as a patient that was inpatient for the majority of 2016, I can confirm that it was normal to see 16-18-years-old eating disorder patients receive treatment within PMH.

However, in the recent move from PMH to Perth Children’s Hospital (PCH) inpatient treatment has been removed for this older age group.

Now, no one with an eating disorder aged 16-18 is to be granted inpatient treatment within PCH. Outpatient treatment, an already dwindling service, is still available. However, inpatient treatment is no longer; leaving a huge question mark on where this age group stands in WA’s system.

There are many issues lying with this decision. Starting with the fact that those aged 16-18 are still legally children; however, are only able to access adult inpatient treatment. These children who are not deemed legally mature enough to drink or to vote, are expected to be able to cope with spending some of their hardest times of their life, in a setting where they are easily made to feel young, vulnerable and out of place.

WA, at current, has no specialised eating disorder unit available in the public system. A patient may choose to fork out the money for private health insurance to be able to receive treatment in Hollywood Hospital’s Eating Disorder Program. However, private insurance is not applicable for many people’s lifestyles; leaving many children to receive treatment in their catchment area’s public hospital.

The public system sees eating disorder patients undergo either mental health treatment in mental health wards or medical stabilisation in medical wards. With no current system in place for the physical and mental aspects of the disorder to be worked on harmoniously and efficiently.

The catchment area system makes it a ‘postcode lottery’ when it comes to treatment, with some public hospitals known to have more efficient mental health treatment in comparison to others.

There is also little public eating disorder beds available within WA, with public hospitals having restrictions over the number of beds available in psychiatric wards that can be occupied by those with an eating disorder, whether that is the primary concern of their admission or not. Because of this, many people are made to wait lengthy periods for mental health treatment or are not able to undergo an admission when they need it.

Yes, if a person is in a crisis situation, a place within some part of the hospital is made available to them. However, in 2018, should it be acceptable to allow people to deteriorate further, waiting until they are on the verge of death to be able to be given opportunities to start getting their lives back?

WA has a minimal number of adult patients who can access inpatient treatment at current. Yet, we are throwing even more people into the mix with 16-18-year-olds being made to access adult inpatient treatment due to the new rules of PCH. It does not make sense.

Another primary concern of the changes inflicted is the fact that adult hospitals have limited educational services available in comparison to what is available for PCH’s inpatients. PCH has specialised teachers available Monday- Friday, with inpatients running on a near normal schooling schedule. In public hospitals, the 16-18-year olds who are most often still in secondary schooling receive minimal educational support in comparison to what is offered at PCH; which is understandable, considering adult hospitals are designed for adults and not school children.

It is highly questionable whether the decision to make 16-18-year-old eating disorder patients only able to access adult inpatient is indeed a good one. However, the main problem exists in the transition period given to make these changes occur. The transition period was barely existent and it seemed as if overnight 16-18-year-olds were no longer able to be inpatients at PCH. The havoc that occurred is still ongoing and many patients have been left with trauma that will most likely be there for years to come.

There are numerous cases where these young patients have been in limbo between hospitals. With one hospital refusing to take them because of the nature of their illness, and the other not able to take them because they already have adults in the allocated eating disorder beds.

I am aware of numerous cases for this new age group in the public hospitals and the treatment can only be described as inadequate and quite frankly – disgusting. Vulnerable young people have been made to feel out of place and an annoyance to the system. They have had uneducated comments thrown at them regularly, whilst they are quickly made to be stabilised and sent home without any real mental health help. Every admission seems to be guided by when the patient can be discharged, instead of how can this admission help the individual.

This steadily inflicted decision was made known quickly, but the reasons why are still unknown. Many think it to be because of the nature of eating disorder treatment and the response it gathers from those high up.

Treatment for a child with an eating disorder isn’t pretty. It is traumatic, lengthy, and difficult beyond measure to treat an illness that is hell-bent on destroying the sufferer. Eating disorder patients are often noncompliant, and security are regular visitors on the ward that treats these children. However, these patients are still people. They are still children. They are still sick children, with deadly illnesses they did not choose and they deserve treatment.

Something needs to be done and as Western Australians, we can not stand for this.

19 thoughts on “WA’s Gap in Eating Disorder Treatment

  1. Avatar
    Kathryn says:

    Thanks for publishing Heidi. This is totally unacceptable practice that we go backwards with support, whilst the statistics of the disorder increase.

  2. Avatar
    Erin says:

    This is one of the most beautifully heartbreaking pieces I’ve ever read, so well articulated and so powerful. This is incredible.

  3. Avatar
    Bobbie says:

    I have watched my daughter go through this horrible illness for the past 3 years. She is approaching 16 and the uncertainty is a real worry for myself and for my daughter as we know some of the young people who have had to go through the public system and the treatment has been appalling to say the least. When someone is malnourished and dehydrated not they are unable to think with any sense and are unable to make decisions that will help their recovery, they are not functioning at the capacity of their age and the most appropriate place for these young people is PCH. Sending love to all young people fighting and all the families that also are living with this illness x

  4. Avatar
    Jodie says:

    Hi Heidi, my daughter was actually an inpatient, diagnosed with AN, along side the author at PMH. While my daughter has been one of the lucky ones and has come out the other side and recovering, it is horrifying to think the system could have gotten any worse, but unfortunately it seems to be the case. I’m so angry that our state government thinks this is ok.

    • Tayla
      Tayla says:

      Hi Jodie,

      Big love to your daughter! <3
      It breaks our heart to know that young girls (and boys) are going through this with minimal help.

  5. Avatar
    Allison says:

    So well written and unfortunately very accurate. Our young people deserve the support of our health system. This illogical disease is a living nightmare and needs medical and mental health professionals to work together and give it the attention it requires – especially for the young people who WANT help

  6. Avatar
    Allison Glenister says:

    So well written and unfortunately very accurate. Our young people deserve the support of our health system. This illogical disease is a living nightmare and needs medical and mental health professionals to work together and give it the attention it requires

  7. Avatar
    Jen says:

    Beautifully written article, it is disgusting that a blind eye has been turned at this issue for so long. It’s insane that people can’t access urgent medical care when needed, even if it is fatal. And if they can access medical care it’s not always appropriate for their specific needs.

  8. Avatar
    Annie Mills says:

    I’m hearing you, having a daughter that has been hospitalised and knowing the lack of help out there because of funding is dreadful. We were lucky enough to get help at Hollywood because she was over 18 and we have private health fund. If we hadn’t sent her there she would have been a statistic, bearing in mind that this desease never goes away – they have to learn to live with it and this also requires out of hospital care, often on a regular basis. You can’t just go to any psychologist ,they have to be skilled in the area…. finding them is not easy and expensive!!
    This article is beautifully written and really depicts the situation in a nutshell. The disease is horrific not just for the patients but the family’s also. We need more facilities and funding is essential especially for those under 18 .

    • Tayla
      Tayla says:

      Big love to you and your family Annie! <3
      Treatment needs to more accessible to patients, we should be wanting to help everyone from any stage of their illness not just when they are terminal!

  9. Avatar
    Kate says:

    That was a great article, it is an interesting and complex situation. If you’re not in the ED program by 16 you go to adult services and that is because it is such a long illness. My daughter started at 14, was transitioned out of PMH this year just before they moved. The complexity lies in the fact that at 16 adolescents can refuse treatment and Children’s hospitals don’t have the resources to deal with that. They try, my daughter was 16 & refused treatment so had to be put under the mental health act to get it. Younger than 16 & you just treat them. There needs to be legislation change or facilities that specifically cater to the 16-25 y olds. Unfortunately the public purse only goes so far.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *